Constitution 130th Amendment Bill 2025

The 130th Amendment Bill has recently stirred intense discussions in the Indian Parliament. This Constitution Bill 2025 has been referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee 130th Amendment for detailed scrutiny amid heated debates in the Lok Sabha.

In this article, we will cover the Constitution 130th Amendment Bill provisions and implications, amendments to Article 75, opposition concerns, the role of the Joint Parliamentary Committee, and its impact — all explained in a way that SSC aspirants can easily understand.

What is the 130th Amendment Bill?

The 130th Amendment Bill proposes crucial changes to Article 75 of the Indian Constitution. It focuses on the minister disqualification law, targeting ministers detained for serious criminal offences.

According to the Bill:

• Any minister arrested and detained for 30 consecutive days on charges of offences punishable with five years or more imprisonment will lose their ministerial post.

• The President, on the advice of the Chief Minister, must remove such a minister by the thirty-first day.

• If the Chief Minister does not advise removal, the minister automatically ceases to hold office.

• After release, a minister can be reappointed, offering some flexibility.

This measure aims to ensure constitutional morality and good governance by preventing detained ministers from exercising executive power.

Amendment to Article 75

Currently, Article 75 outlines the appointment and responsibilities of the Council of Ministers. The 130th Amendment Bill provisions and implications include a new clause that ensures:

• Ministers facing serious criminal allegations cannot hold office for more than 30 days during detention.

• The amendment strengthens ministerial accountability and introduces a mechanism to uphold constitutional morality.

For SSC students, it is important to note that this amendment links criminal accountability directly with the executive office, which has been widely discussed in political and legal circles.

Opposition Concerns

The 130th Amendment Bill has faced strong opposition from multiple parties.

Key concerns include:

• Violation of presumption of innocence: Punishing ministers on arrest rather than conviction.

• Political misuse: Opposition fears the Bill could be used to target political rivals.

• Threat to federalism and democracy: Leaders like Mamata Banerjee warned that it may lead to authoritarian control.

• Separation of powers undermined: AIMIM’s Asaduddin Owaisi stated the Bill risks making the executive act as judge and executioner.

During the 130th Amendment Bill Lok Sabha debate, these issues were extensively discussed, reflecting the broader tension between governance reforms and democratic rights.

Role of the Joint Parliamentary Committee

After the debate, the Bill was referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee 130th Amendment.

Its responsibilities include:

• Scrutinizing the Constitution 130th Amendment Bill provisions and implications.

• Submit a report before the next parliamentary session.

• Offering recommendations, which, although not binding, carry persuasive weight.

For SSC exams, understanding the role of JPCs is essential, as it illustrates how temporary committees influence legislative processes.

Implications of the 130th Amendment Bill

The Impact of the 130th Amendment Bill on ministerial accountability can be summarized as:

• Challenges legal principles: The Presumption of innocence is questioned as ministers can be removed before conviction.

• Potential political instability: Removal based on arrest can affect state governments.

• Partial flexibility: Reappointment after release addresses some concerns but may not prevent misuse.

• Reinforces good governance: Encourages ministerial accountability and ethical governance.

In essence, the 130th Amendment Bill represents an ongoing tension between constitutional reforms in India 2025 and the protection of democratic rights.

FAQs for SSC Aspirants

Q1. What is the main purpose of the 130th Amendment Bill?

The Bill aims to disqualify ministers detained for serious offences beyond 30 days, ensuring accountability and good governance.

Q2. Which Article of the Constitution does the Bill amend?
It amends Article 75, which outlines the appointment and responsibilities of the Council of Ministers.

Q3. Can a minister be reappointed after release?
Yes, the Bill allows reappointment after the minister is released from custody.

Q4. What role does the Joint Parliamentary Committee play?
The JPC scrutinizes the Constitution 130th Amendment Bill, examines provisions, and submits a report to Parliament with recommendations.

Q5. Why do critics oppose the Bill?
Critics argue it violates the presumption of innocence, risks political misuse, and may undermine federalism and democratic principles.

Final Thoughts

The 130th Amendment Bill marks a significant step in strengthening ministerial accountability in India. By amending Article 75, the Bill ensures that ministers detained for serious offences cannot hold office beyond 30 days, reflecting a focus on good governance and constitutional morality.

While the Bill provides a framework for removal and reappointment, it has sparked debates over the presumption of innocence and potential political misuse. The role of the Joint Parliamentary Committee highlights the importance of detailed scrutiny before implementation.

Overall, the Constitution 130th Amendment Bill balances legal accountability with governance reforms, but its political and constitutional implications will continue to shape discussions in Parliament. It represents the ongoing challenge of aligning democratic principles with effective political accountability.