Current Affairs-Topics

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Order on Birthright Citizenship

A federal judge in Seattle has temporarily halted Donald Trump’s first major executive order since his return to office, deeming it "clearly unconstitutional."

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order Temporarily Blocked

A federal judge in Seattle has temporarily blocked Donald Trump’s first major executive order since his return to office, declaring it “blatantly unconstitutional.” The order sought to limit birthright citizenship in the United States, sparking widespread legal and political debate.

What is Birthright Citizenship in the US?

Birthright citizenship guarantees that almost everyone born on US soil automatically receives citizenship, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. This principle is based on jus soli—the “right of the soil”—which has roots in English common law.

Historical Background

  • The 14th Amendment: Ratified in 1868, this amendment was designed to grant citizenship to freed slaves. It states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
  • Exceptions: Children of foreign diplomats or enemy occupiers are excluded from this rule. Currently, the US is one of around 30 countries worldwide, primarily in the Americas, that uphold this principle.

Trump’s Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship

Upon returning to office, Donald Trump signed an executive order to end birthright citizenship, labeling it an “absolutely ridiculous” practice. Trump argued that the US is the “only country” with such a law (an incorrect claim).

Key Provisions of the Order

  • The order would deny citizenship to children born in the US after February 19, 2025, if neither parent is a US citizen or permanent resident.
  • Affected children would not have access to citizenship, social security numbers, government benefits, or legal work opportunities.

Trump defended this move by stating that children of non-citizens are not under US jurisdiction and, therefore, do not qualify for citizenship under the 14th Amendment.

If enforced, this policy could strip citizenship from over 150,000 newborns annually, leading to significant legal and social challenges.

Legal Challenges and Opposition

The order has faced robust opposition, with multiple lawsuits arguing that it violates the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause.
Four states—Washington, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon—filed the first legal challenge, calling the order unconstitutional.

Key Arguments Against the Order

  • The 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the US.
  • The order disregards established legal precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.
  • Critics warn that the policy would create a stateless population in the US, denying fundamental rights to children born in the country.

Judge John Coughenour’s Ruling

Judge John Coughenour, a Reagan appointee, issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) halting Trump’s executive order.
Coughenour referred to the order as “blatantly unconstitutional” and expressed skepticism about the administration's defense of the policy. He remarked that the issue was clear-cut, stating, “I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one.”

The Justice Department’s Response

Brett Shumate, representing the DOJ, defended the executive order, arguing that its legal basis hadn’t been previously tested and warranted judicial review. He also suggested that a TRO wasn’t needed as the policy wouldn’t take effect until February 2025. Despite this, Judge Coughenour proceeded with the restraining order.

The DOJ stated they would “vigorously defend” the order, asserting that it correctly interprets the 14th Amendment.

Broader Implications

Trump’s executive order has reignited discussions on immigration, citizenship rights, and the interpretation of the 14th Amendment. If upheld, the policy could result in:

  • A stateless population within the US.
  • Legal difficulties for families and children.
  • A major shift in how US citizenship is determined, with far-reaching consequences.

The case is likely to progress through the courts, with a potential Supreme Court ruling that could set a significant precedent for future immigration and citizenship policies.

More Related Articles

First G7 Nation to Recognize Palestine

The announcement that France recognizes Palestine in September 2025 has marked a historic moment in global diplomacy. This is the first G7 country recognition of the State of Palestine, signaling

Thai F‑16 Border Conflict & History

The Thai F‑16 border conflict became a significant international issue in July 2025, drawing global attention due to escalating military strikes, territorial disputes, and diplomatic tensions be

EU & G7 Lower Russia Oil Price Cap

The Russia oil price cap is once again dominating headlines as the European Union (EU) announced its 18th package of sanctions against Russia. These measures are specifically designed to reduce Ru

Yarlung Zangbo Dam Project of China

The Yarlung Zangbo Dam Project is one of the most significant international developments in recent times. Positioned on the eastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau, this Chinese dam project is set to

Solar Corona Heating Mystery 2025

One of the most baffling and long-standing questions in astrophysics is the Solar corona heating mystery – Why is the solar corona millions of degrees hotter than the Sun’s surface? NA

SAFE Strategy WHO for Disease Control

In July 2025, Senegal achieved a major public health milestone when the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared the country free of trachoma as a public health problem. This developmen

UK General Election 2029 Changes

The UK general election 2029 changes have introduced a series of significant reforms to the UK’s electoral system. These reforms aim to increase youth participation, modernise the voting sys

Ukraine's New Prime Minister 2025

In a major political development, Yuliia Svyrydenko has been appointed as the new Prime Minister of 2025, replacing Denys Shmyhal. This strategic shift, initiated by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy,

WHO Treatment Protocol for Zika Virus 2025

In July 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) released its first-ever unified clinical guidelines for managing arboviral diseases, including Zika virus, dengue, chikungunya, and yellow fever.

Khmer Rouge Genocide in Cambodia

In a landmark decision on July 11, 2025, UNESCO officially recognized three sites linked to the Khmer Rouge genocide history as World Heritage Sites. This inclusion occurred during the 47th Se

Toppers

anil kumar
Akshay kuamr
geeta kumari
shubham