Current Affairs-Topics

Retaliatory Tariffs and International Trade Law


U.S. Reciprocal Tariffs and the Challenge to International Trade Law: A Wake-Up Call for India and the Global South.
The global trade order has once again been rattled—this time by the U.S. reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2, 2025, under the leadership of President Donald Trump.

The statement has already caused worldwide indignation, even though the policy is only temporarily on hold for 90 days (excluding tariffs on China).

The most worrisome component is that the tariffs are against international trade law, especially the standards set by the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

Even more disappointing is India’s trade response, which has been widely perceived as muted, especially when it is expected to lead the Global South in advocating a fair and rule-based trading system.

The Nature of U.S. Reciprocal Tariffs

Tariffs that are reciprocal are fundamentally one-sided. This policy gives one nation the power to punish another for what it sees as unfair trade practices by imposing taxes on goods and services. But within the global framework of the World Trade Organisation, such measures constitute an obvious breach of international trade law.

A basic idea of WTO rules, the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) principle prevents trade discrimination among members of different countries. The US choice to apply selective tariffs runs counter to this idea.

Instead of supporting a rule-based global system, President Trump has advocated a transactional approach in his trade policies. His administration’s move is not just a trade policy shift; it is a direct challenge to the legitimacy of international trade law.

Global Reactions: From BRICS to Canada

In response to the US declaration, several nations have spoken out strongly in support of international trade law and the rule-based trading system. China has denounced the U.S. decision, initiated a formal dispute at the WTO, and imposed retaliatory tariffs on American goods.

  • Brazil, another BRICS member, termed the tariffs a “violation” of WTO commitments.

  • Singapore's Prime Minister Lawrence Wong declared the action a “complete repudiation of the MFN principle”.

  • Japan stated unequivocally that the unilateral imposition of tariffs contradicts WTO rules.

  • Canada has taken a two-pronged approach imposed retaliatory tariffs and simultaneously filed a legal challenge at the WTO regarding tariffs on automobiles and auto parts.

The BRICS trade stance, especially that of China and Brazil, reflects a strong alignment with international trade law and a commitment to multilateralism.

India’s Weak Trade Response: A Lost Opportunity?

The trade response of India has been significantly more moderate, in stark contrast. Despite the widespread expectation that India would assume a leadership role on behalf of the Global South, the silence has been deafening.

India, a burgeoning economic power and a critical participant in the Global South leadership, possesses the capacity and responsibility to advocate for international trade law.

Historically, India has been a vocal advocate for the rule-based trading system. Its lack of a robust response now sends the wrong signals—not just to its trading partners but also to the developing world that looks up to India for representation and voice at the global stage.

The WTO in Crisis?

Questions regarding the World Trade Organization's relevance and jurisdiction are brought to light by the introduction of U.S. reciprocal tariffs.

The United States' obstructionism has made the World Trade Organization's Appellate Body even more ineffective in recent years. Because strong nations like the US are breaking international trade law, the dispute settlement process of the WTO is in a precarious position.

Establishing a precedent whereby nations reject the MFN concept and apply retaliatory tariffs without following correct processes would be counterproductive. Trade confidence and stability have dropped as multilateral bodies have collapsed.

Implications for UPSC Aspirants

For UPSC aspirants, understanding this issue is crucial for multiple areas of the syllabus:

1. GS Paper II – International Relations

  • India's foreign policy posture in global trade

  • Role in Global South leadership

  • Multilateral institutions like the WTO

2. GS Paper III – Economic Development

  • Impact of retaliatory tariffs on the

  • India’s trade policy and international trade law

3. Essay & Ethics

What Should India Do?

India needs to reconsider its position. An individual's credibility is undermined when they remain silent in the face of injustice. As a country aiming for world leadership, India should:

  • Publicly condemn the U.S. tariffs as violations of international trade law

  • Coordinate with other BRICS and developing nations to build pressure within the WTO.

  • Strengthen legal and diplomatic channels to ensure adherence to MFN principles.

  • Reignite its commitment to a rule-based trading system.

India will further solidify its role as a leading example of fair trade among developing countries and safeguard its own interests through its proactive leadership.

Final Thoughts

The current episode of U.S. reciprocal tariffs is not just another trade dispute; it is a fundamental challenge to the international trade law system. Countries like China, Brazil, and Canada have stepped up to defend multilateralism.

It is time for India to do the same. With its geopolitical stature and moral responsibility, India must rise to the occasion, defend the rule-based trading system, and guide the Global South toward a more equitable global trade order.

More Related Articles

India Rejects SCO Joint Statement

India rejects SCO joint statement – this powerful decision echoed globally after India’s Defence Minister refused to sign the final declaration at the SCO 2025 Summit in Qingdao, China

Unsafe Generic Chemotherapy Drugs

Recent investigations have uncovered serious quality issues in generic chemotherapy drugs used for cancer treatment across more than 100 countries. This has raised alarms over the safety, effe

NATO Defence Spending 2025

The NATO defence spending 2025 summit has marked a historic turning point in the alliance’s approach to global defence and military funding. Under the leadership of former U.S. President

Operation Bashayer Al-Fath

On June 23, 2025, the Middle East witnessed a major escalation as Iran launched Operation Bashayer Al-Fath, a powerful missile assault targeting the US Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. This developm

GENIUS Act 2025 Highlights

The GENIUS Act 2025, passed by the US Senate in June 2025, represents a significant legislative step in cryptocurrency regulation, with a widespread impact on stablecoins, digi

US-Iran Nuclear Conflict 2025

On June 22, 2025, the United States launched targeted airstrikes on three major Iranian nuclear facilities—Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz—escalating what is now widely recognized as the U

Iran Uranium Enrichment

The ongoing tension between Iran, Israel, and the United States has taken a serious turn, primarily due to Iran's uranium enrichment issue. The situation surrounding Iran’s Fordow nuclea

Yeztugo HIV Injection

In a historic development in the fight against HIV, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has approved Yeztugo HIV injection—a revolutionary drug for the long-acting preven

EU Russian Gas Imports Ban

EU Russian gas imports have been a cornerstone of Europe's energy infrastructure for decades. However, following the Russia-Ukraine energy conflict that began with Russia's invasion of

113th International Labour Conference Highlights 2025

The 113th International Labour Conference, organized by the International Labour Organization (ILO), concluded on 13 June 2025 in Geneva. This significant global event brought together represe

Toppers

anil kumar
Akshay kuamr
geeta kumari
shubham