Current Affairs-Topics

Retaliatory Tariffs and International Trade Law


U.S. Reciprocal Tariffs and the Challenge to International Trade Law: A Wake-Up Call for India and the Global South.
The global trade order has once again been rattled—this time by the U.S. reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2, 2025, under the leadership of President Donald Trump.

The statement has already caused worldwide indignation, even though the policy is only temporarily on hold for 90 days (excluding tariffs on China).

The most worrisome component is that the tariffs are against international trade law, especially the standards set by the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

Even more disappointing is India’s trade response, which has been widely perceived as muted, especially when it is expected to lead the Global South in advocating a fair and rule-based trading system.

The Nature of U.S. Reciprocal Tariffs

Tariffs that are reciprocal are fundamentally one-sided. This policy gives one nation the power to punish another for what it sees as unfair trade practices by imposing taxes on goods and services. But within the global framework of the World Trade Organisation, such measures constitute an obvious breach of international trade law.

A basic idea of WTO rules, the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) principle prevents trade discrimination among members of different countries. The US choice to apply selective tariffs runs counter to this idea.

Instead of supporting a rule-based global system, President Trump has advocated a transactional approach in his trade policies. His administration’s move is not just a trade policy shift; it is a direct challenge to the legitimacy of international trade law.

Global Reactions: From BRICS to Canada

In response to the US declaration, several nations have spoken out strongly in support of international trade law and the rule-based trading system. China has denounced the U.S. decision, initiated a formal dispute at the WTO, and imposed retaliatory tariffs on American goods.

  • Brazil, another BRICS member, termed the tariffs a “violation” of WTO commitments.

  • Singapore's Prime Minister Lawrence Wong declared the action a “complete repudiation of the MFN principle”.

  • Japan stated unequivocally that the unilateral imposition of tariffs contradicts WTO rules.

  • Canada has taken a two-pronged approach imposed retaliatory tariffs and simultaneously filed a legal challenge at the WTO regarding tariffs on automobiles and auto parts.

The BRICS trade stance, especially that of China and Brazil, reflects a strong alignment with international trade law and a commitment to multilateralism.

India’s Weak Trade Response: A Lost Opportunity?

The trade response of India has been significantly more moderate, in stark contrast. Despite the widespread expectation that India would assume a leadership role on behalf of the Global South, the silence has been deafening.

India, a burgeoning economic power and a critical participant in the Global South leadership, possesses the capacity and responsibility to advocate for international trade law.

Historically, India has been a vocal advocate for the rule-based trading system. Its lack of a robust response now sends the wrong signals—not just to its trading partners but also to the developing world that looks up to India for representation and voice at the global stage.

The WTO in Crisis?

Questions regarding the World Trade Organization's relevance and jurisdiction are brought to light by the introduction of U.S. reciprocal tariffs.

The United States' obstructionism has made the World Trade Organization's Appellate Body even more ineffective in recent years. Because strong nations like the US are breaking international trade law, the dispute settlement process of the WTO is in a precarious position.

Establishing a precedent whereby nations reject the MFN concept and apply retaliatory tariffs without following correct processes would be counterproductive. Trade confidence and stability have dropped as multilateral bodies have collapsed.

Implications for UPSC Aspirants

For UPSC aspirants, understanding this issue is crucial for multiple areas of the syllabus:

1. GS Paper II – International Relations

  • India's foreign policy posture in global trade

  • Role in Global South leadership

  • Multilateral institutions like the WTO

2. GS Paper III – Economic Development

  • Impact of retaliatory tariffs on the

  • India’s trade policy and international trade law

3. Essay & Ethics

What Should India Do?

India needs to reconsider its position. An individual's credibility is undermined when they remain silent in the face of injustice. As a country aiming for world leadership, India should:

  • Publicly condemn the U.S. tariffs as violations of international trade law

  • Coordinate with other BRICS and developing nations to build pressure within the WTO.

  • Strengthen legal and diplomatic channels to ensure adherence to MFN principles.

  • Reignite its commitment to a rule-based trading system.

India will further solidify its role as a leading example of fair trade among developing countries and safeguard its own interests through its proactive leadership.

Final Thoughts

The current episode of U.S. reciprocal tariffs is not just another trade dispute; it is a fundamental challenge to the international trade law system. Countries like China, Brazil, and Canada have stepped up to defend multilateralism.

It is time for India to do the same. With its geopolitical stature and moral responsibility, India must rise to the occasion, defend the rule-based trading system, and guide the Global South toward a more equitable global trade order.

More Related Articles

Anutin Charnvirakul: Thailand New PM 2025

Staying updated with international current affairs is crucial for SSC exams, and one of the most important global political developments in 2025 is the election of Thailand's New PM 2025 Anuti

Nepal Bans Social Media

In a landmark digital policy move, the Government of Nepal has announced that Nepal banning social media, targeting 26 unregistered platforms. The decision, revealed by Minister of Communications

e-VidyaBharati Scholarships 2025

In a significant gesture of academic and diplomatic outreach, India has announced 1,000 e-scholarships for Afghan students for the academic year 2025–26. These scholarships are offered under

SCO Summit China 2025

The 2025 Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit China hosted by China, brought together member countries to discuss regional development, technological innovation, and educational collabor

Mineral Security India Japan MoC

In a significant step toward reinforcing their strategic partnership, India and Japan have signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) focused on critical minerals, a move that has far-reaching impli

India Japan Summit 2025

At a time of rising global uncertainty, the India-Japan Summit 2025 emerged as a landmark event, reaffirming the deep-rooted friendship between India and Japan. During Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsq

Digital Detox Education for Students

In a landmark decision to tackle the growing concerns of social media addiction among students, South Korea has introduced a new law promoting Digital Detox Education by banning the use of mobile

Inga Ruginiene: New Prime Minister

In a landmark development in Lithuanian politics, Inga Ruginiene's launch of her leadership has been officially approved by the Lithuanian parliament, making her the new Prime Minister of Lith

IMD Smart City Rankings 2025

The IMD Smart City Rankings 2025, released by the International Institute for Management Development (IMD), highlights how cities across the globe are leveraging technology, infrastructure, and go

Gaza Humanitarian Crisis 2025

The Gaza humanitarian crisis continues to be a pressing issue in 2025, attracting global attention due to its severe impact on millions of people living in the region. For SSC aspirants, understan

Toppers

anil kumar
Akshay kuamr
geeta kumari
shubham